Jenkins v. Doe et al
| Steve Jenkins |
| FNU Ivery, J. Winton, B. Smith, John/Jane Doe, FNU Agard and R. Baker |
| 5:2024cv00401 |
| August 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| John L Badalamenti |
| Philip R Lammens |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
STANDING ORDER for all incarcerated pro se litigants. Signed by Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens on 8/5/2024. (MGB)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Request for Withdrawal of Inmates Personal Funds by Steve Jenkins. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MGB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Steve Jenkins. (MGB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Philip R. Lammens. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against FNU Agard, R. Baker, John/Jane Doe(Acting Warden, In their Individual and Official Capacity ), John/Jane Doe(Administrative Remedy Coordinator, In their Individual and Official Capacity ), John/Jane Doe(Acting Warden, In their Individual and Official Capacity ), John/Jane Doe(SIS Lieutenant, In their Individual and Official Capacity ), John/Jane Doe(Segregation Review Official, In their Individual and Official Capacity ), FNU Ivery, B. Smith, J. Winton filed by Steve Jenkins. (No service copies provided) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Mailing Envelope)(MGB) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
