Brooks v. Equable Ascent Financial, LLC
Plaintiff: Nicole Brooks
Defendant: Equable Ascent Financial, LLC
Case Number: 6:2013cv00667
Filed: April 24, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Orlando Office
County: Orange
Presiding Judge: David A. Baker
Presiding Judge: Roy B. Dalton
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting 5 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Roy B. Dalton, Jr. on 4/30/2013. (VMF)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Brooks v. Equable Ascent Financial, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicole Brooks
Represented By: Michael Tierney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Equable Ascent Financial, LLC
Represented By: Robert Franklin Springfield
Represented By: Matthew J. Devine
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?