Hinkle v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

Hinkle v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Jesse Hinkle
Defendant:	Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Case Number:	6:2016cv01453
Filed:	August 15, 2016
Court:	US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office:	Orlando Office
County:	Orange
Presiding Judge:	David A. Baker
Presiding Judge:	Carlos E. Mendoza
Nature of Suit:	Fair Labor Standards Act
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
January 25, 2018	Filing 22 ORDER granting 20 Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Dismissal with Prejudice; Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 21 Report and Recommendations. Insofar as the Settlement Agreement addresses Plaintiff's FLSA claims, and as amended by this Court, it is APPROVED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/25/2018. (DJD)
October 13, 2016	Filing 15 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 motion to dismiss; Defendant's motion is granted insofar as it requests that this Court compel arbitration and stay this case. It is denied in all other respects. The parties are directe d to proceed with arbitration, and they shall file a status report every ninety days from the date of this Order. This case is STAYED. The Clerk is directed to administratively close this case. Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 13 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/13/2016. (DJD)

Date Filed

Document Text

January 25, 2018

Filing 22 ORDER granting 20 Joint Motion for Approval of Settlement and Dismissal with Prejudice; Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 21 Report and Recommendations. Insofar as the Settlement Agreement addresses Plaintiff's FLSA claims, and as amended by this Court, it is APPROVED. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 1/25/2018. (DJD)

October 13, 2016

Filing 15 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 6 motion to dismiss; Defendant's motion is granted insofar as it requests that this Court compel arbitration and stay this case. It is denied in all other respects. The parties are directe d to proceed with arbitration, and they shall file a status report every ninety days from the date of this Order. This case is STAYED. The Clerk is directed to administratively close this case. Adopting Report and Recommendations - re 13 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/13/2016. (DJD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hinkle v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jesse Hinkle
Represented By:	Michael Lawrence Grossman
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.
Represented By:	Anthony J. Hall
Represented By:	Jeffrey Bernard Jones
Represented By:	Melanie Andre Zaharias
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?