Florida Abolitionist et al v. Backpage.com LLC et al
| Florida Abolitionist and Jane Doe |
| Backpage.com LLC, EvilEmpire.com, BigCity.com, Carl Ferrer, Michael Lacey and James Larkin |
| 6:2017cv00218 |
| February 7, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Orlando Office |
| Orange |
| John Antoon |
| Thomas B. Smith |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
159
ORDER granting 149 Motion to Stay Proceedings; denying 154 Motion to Strike; denying without prejudice all other pending motions; directing Defendant Ferrer to file a status report at the conclusion of criminal actions in the trial courts; and directing the Clerk to administratively close this case. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 12/5/2018. (EK)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER granting 87 Motion for Plaintiffs Jane Doe #2 and Susan Roe to proceed anonymously. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 5/1/2018. (Smith, Thomas)
|
|
Filing
85
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 42 Motion to Dismiss; dismissing 1 Complaint without prejudice; and setting deadline of April 30, 2018, for the filing of an amended complaint. Signed by Judge John Antoon II on 3/31/2018. (EK)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER granting 2 Motion for Plaintiff Jane Doe to proceed anonymously. Signed by Magistrate Judge Thomas B. Smith on 5/18/2017. (Smith, Thomas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
