Bahadur v. Commissioner of Social Security
Roopwatee Bahadur |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
6:2020cv02133 |
November 20, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Daniel C Irick |
G Kendall Sharp |
Social Security: SSID Title XVI |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 25, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) re #3 Related case order by Roopwatee Bahadur. Related case(s): no (Harrington, Chantal) Modified on 11/25/2020 (SPM). |
Filing 5 ORDER requiring electronic filing of the administrative record in Social Security cases (See 6:10-mc-95-ORL-22, Doc. 1) Signed by Judge Anne C. Conway on 07/23/2010. (ARJ) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Commissioner of Social Security, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (ARJ) |
Filing 3 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Notice of pendency of other actions due within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp on 11/20/2020. (counsel emailed)(AKC) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Senior Judge G. Kendall Sharp and Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:20-cv-2133-Orl-18DCI. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-17576244) filed by Roopwatee Bahadur. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Harrington, Chantal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.