Banur v. Mayorkas et al
Plaintiff: Khalid Banur
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur M. Jaddou
Case Number: 6:2021cv01715
Filed: October 14, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Leslie R Hoffman
Referring Judge: Carlos E Mendoza
Nature of Suit: Other Immigration Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 12, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 12, 2021 Filing 15 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Khalid Banur. Related case(s): No (LDJ)
November 12, 2021 Filing 14 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #7 Order by Khalid Banur. (LDJ)
November 10, 2021 Filing 13 (WRONG EVENT CODE. ATTORNEY NOTIFIED AND WILL REFILE) NOTICE by Khalid Banur Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement (Ahmed, Shahzad) Modified on 11/12/2021 (RDO).
November 10, 2021 Filing 12 (WRONG EVENT CODE. ATTORNEY NOTIFIED AND WILL REFILE)NOTICE by Khalid Banur of Pendency of Other Actions (Ahmed, Shahzad) Modified on 11/12/2021 (RDO).
October 29, 2021 Filing 11 SUMMONS issued as U.S. Attorney. (ARJ)
October 29, 2021 Filing 10 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Khalid Banur. (Ahmed, Shahzad)
October 29, 2021 Filing 9 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Khalid Banur. (Ahmed, Shahzad)
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL AND PARTIES: Failure to comply with ANY Local Rules or Court Orders may result in the imposition of sanctions including, but not limited to, the dismissal of this action or entry of default without further notice. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/27/2021. (MEH) ctp
October 27, 2021 Opinion or Order Filing 7 INITIAL ORDER re: Case Management and Deadlines. Signed by Judge Carlos E. Mendoza on 10/27/2021. (MEH) ctp
October 26, 2021 Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to Ur M. Jaddou and Alejandro Mayorkas (ARJ)
October 26, 2021 Filing 5 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Khalid Banur. (Ahmed, Shahzad)
October 14, 2021 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE/NOTICE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Khalid Banur. (ARJ)
October 14, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Khalid Banur. Related case(s): No (ARJ)
October 14, 2021 Filing 2 PROPOSED summons to be issued by Khalid Banur. (ARJ)
October 14, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ur M. Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas Filing fee $402, receipt number ORL100697 filed by Khalid Banur. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ARJ)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Banur v. Mayorkas et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Khalid Banur
Represented By: Shahzad Ahmed
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Alejandro Mayorkas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Ur M. Jaddou
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?