Ramos v. Commissioner of Social Security
Gabriel Ramos |
Commissioner of Social Security |
SSA |
6:2024cv02273 |
December 13, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Patricia D Barksdale |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Patricia D. Barksdale. New case number: 6:24-cv-2273-PDB. Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick no longer assigned to the case. (NAS) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Gabriel Ramos. (Boyd, Bradley) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Gabriel Ramos. Related case(s): No (Boyd, Bradley) |
![]() |
Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Daniel C. Irick. New case number: 6:24-cv-2273-DCI. (RLK) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Bradley K. Boyd on behalf of Gabriel J Ramos. Lead Counsel: Bradley K Boyd. (Boyd, Bradley) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Gabriel J Ramos. (Boyd, Bradley) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Gabriel J Ramos. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boyd, Bradley) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.