Grifka v. United States Attorney General et al
| Mathew Grifka |
| United States Attorney General, United States Attorney for the Middle District of Florida, Department of Homeland Security Transport Security Administration, United States Department of Justice - Civil Rights Division, United States Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration - Office of the General Counsel, Florida Department of Children and Families (DCF), Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), Orange County Clerk of Courts, Orange County Sheriff's Office, Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles and Ninth Judicial Circuit Court of Florida, Mental Health Division |
| 6:2025cv00870 |
| May 19, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Wendy W Berger |
| Leslie Hoffman Price |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Mathew Grifka. (MLB) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Leslie Hoffman Price. (E-portal) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Mathew Grifka. (Attachments: #1 Table of Contents, #2 Cover Letter, #3 Mock Behavioral Analysis, #4 Proposed Summons (Not Issued), #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(MLB) (E-portal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
