Cardiovascular Care of Sarasota, P.A. v. Cardinal Health, Inc. et al
| Cardiovascular Care of Sarasota, P.A. |
| Cardinal Health, Inc. and Cardinal Health 414, Inc. |
| 8:2008cv01931 |
| September 26, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement Office |
| Sarasota |
| Thomas B. McCoun III |
| James S. Moody |
| Plaintiff |
| Federal Question |
| 28:1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
54
ORDER: Plaintiffs' Motion to Certify Class 36 is DENIED. Defendants' Motion to Stay Class Certification Proceedings Pending Discovery and Disposition of Anticipated Summary Judgment Motion on the Merits of Plaintiffs' Individual Cl aims 49 is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff Cardinal Health, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Counts I and II of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint 41 , Plaintiffs Cardinal Health 414, LLC and Cardinal Health, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Count III of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint 42 , and Plaintiffs Cardinal Health 100, Inc. and Cardinal Health, Inc.s Motion to Dismiss Count IV of Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint are DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint 30 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and to CLOSE this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 4/3/2009. (LN)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
