Dawe v. Rogers et al
Plaintiff: Michael J. Dawe
Defendant: Jeffrey Rogers, Adam Bugg, Lester Aradis and City of Largo, Florida
Case Number: 8:2009cv00620
Filed: April 2, 2009
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Civil Rights: Other Office
County: Pinellas
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A. Jenkins
Presiding Judge: James S. Moody
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: Federal Question
Jury Demanded By: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 57 ORDER dismissing case. Clerk is directed to close the file. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 4/23/2010. (LN)
February 19, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 56 ORDER denying 52 Defendants' Motion for Attorneys' Fees and Costs. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/19/2010. (LN)
February 3, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 50 is GRANTED. The Clerk is directed to enter Final Summary Judgment in favor of Defendants City of Largo, Florida d/b/a City of Largo Police Department and Chief Lester Aradi and against Plaintiff Michael J. Dawe. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/3/2010. (LN)
January 15, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER: Defendants Rogers and Bugg's Dispostive Motion for Summary Judgment 32 is GRANTED. The CLERK is directed to enter Final Summary Judgment in favor of Defendants Jeffrey Rogers and Adam Bugg and against Plaintiff Michael J. Dawe. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 1/15/2010. (LN)
August 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER: Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 18 is DENIED, except that Count V shall be dismissed pursuant to Plaintiff's response agreeing to same. As to Rogers' and Bugg's arguments that they are entitled to qualified immunity, Rogers and Bugg may conduct limited discovery for the next 60 days on the issue of qualified immunity and again raise the issue in a motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 8/18/2009. (LN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dawe v. Rogers et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael J. Dawe
Represented By: Michael P. Maddux
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Rogers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adam Bugg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lester Aradis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Largo, Florida
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?