PGT Industries, Inc. v. Harris & Pritchard Contracting Services LLC et al
PGT Industries, Inc. |
Harris & Pritchard Contracting Services LLC and David M. Harris |
8:2012cv00358 |
February 21, 2012 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Tampa Office |
Sarasota |
Virginia M. Hernandez Covington |
Thomas G. Wilson |
Other Contract |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 47 ORDER: Plaintiff PGT Industries, Inc.'s Motion for Prejudgment Interest, Attorneys' Fees and Costs 46 is GRANTED. Plaintiff PGT Industries, Inc. shall recover from Defendants, Harris & Pritchard Contracting Services, LLC and David Harris, jointly and severally, the amount of $107,374.53, together with prejudgment interest in the amount of $39,929.00 through April 10, 2013, court costs in the amount of $1,495.45, and attorneys' fees in the amount of $49,052.07 , making a total of $197,851.05, for which let multiple writs of execution issue as may be requested by Plaintiff PGT Industries, Inc., that shall bear interest at the prevailing statutory interest rate in accordance with section 55.03, Florida Statutes. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff PGT Industries, Inc. and against Defendants Harris & Pritchard Contracting Services, LLC and David Harris consistent with the foregoing. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/9/2013. (LRM) |
Filing 43 ORDER: Plaintiff PGT Industries, Inc.'s Motion for Default Judgment Against Defendant Harris & Pritchard Contracting Services, LLC 42 is GRANTED. Plaintiff PGT Industries, Inc.'s Motion to Consider Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judg ment as Unopposed and to Enter Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff 39 is GRANTED to the extent that the Court considers Plaintiff PGT Industries, Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment 33 as unopposed. Plaintiff PGT Industries, Inc.'s Mo tion for Summary Judgment 33 is GRANTED as to Defendant David M. Harris and DENIED as moot as to Defendant Harris & Pritchard Contracting Services, LLC. Entry of judgment will be reserved until the amount of costs, fees, and prejudgment interest is determined. Plaintiff PGT Industries, Inc. may file with the Court a motion addressing prejudgment interest, fees, and costs on or before April 12, 2013. Additionally, Plaintiff PGT Industries, Inc. is directed to submit a proposed judgment to the Court on or before April 12, 2013. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 3/29/2013. (LRM) |
Filing 40 ORDER: Plaintiff PGT Industries, Inc.'s Motion to Strike Defendant Harris & Pritchard Contracting Services, LLC's Answer and Affirmative Defenses 38 is GRANTED. Defendant Harris & Pritchard Contracting Services, LLC's Answer and Aff irmative Pleadings 5 is hereby STRICKEN. Plaintiff PGT Industries, Inc.'s construed Motion for Entry of Default Judgment 38 is GRANTED as against Defendant Harris & Pritchard Contracting Services, LLC. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter default against Defendant Harris & Pritchard Contracting Services, LLC. Plaintiff shall file a motion for default judgment after default is entered by the Clerk against Defendant Harris & Pritchard. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 3/15/2013. (LRM) |
Filing 36 ORDER: Defendant Harris & Pritchard Contracting Services, LLC has until and including February 6, 2013, to retain new counsel. In the event that new counsel is retained, Harris & Pritchard is directed to file a response to the motion for summary judg ment on or before February 20, 2013. Absent a notice of appearance of counsel filed on behalf of Harris & Pritchard by February 6, 2013, this Court will entertain an appropriate motion to strike Harris & Pritchard's pleadings. Thereafter, Harri s & Pritchard will be poised for the entry of default against it. Defendant David M. Harris has until February 6, 2013, to notify the Court if he intends to proceed in this action pro se or to file a notice of appearance of counsel. If he intends to proceed pro se, Harris is directed to file a response to Plaintiff PGT Industries, Inc.'s motion for summary judgment by or on February 6, 2013. If Harris fails to so file, the Court will consider PGT's motion for summary judgment as unopposed. In the event that new counsel is retained, Harris is directed to file a response to the motion for summary judgment on or before February 20, 2013. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 1/22/2013. (LRM) |
Filing 24 ORDER: The Report and Recommendation of Thomas G. Wilson, United States Magistrate Judge 21 is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED.Defendant David M. Harris's Motion to Dismiss 6 is DENIED. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 8/7/2012. (MEB) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.