Provident Bank v. Hill
Plaintiff: Provident Bank
Defendant: John S. Hill
Case Number: 8:2012cv01663
Filed: July 25, 2012
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Anthony E. Porcelli
Presiding Judge: James D. Whittemore
Nature of Suit: Marine
Cause of Action: 46:31301
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 26, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER adopting 32 REPORT AND CERTIFICATION. Defendant is found to be in Civil Contempt. Show cause hearing scheduled for 7/17/13 at 3:00 P.M. The clerk is directed to forward a copy of this Order to the U.S. Marshal for service. Signed by Judge James D. Whittemore on 6/26/2013. (KE)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Provident Bank v. Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Provident Bank
Represented By: Adam B. Cooke
Represented By: Robert D. McIntosh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John S. Hill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?