Lane et al v. Quicken Loans Inc. et al
Plaintiff: Jennifer L. Lane and Joseph D. Lane
Defendant: Quicken Loans Inc. and John Does
Case Number: 8:2013cv01271
Filed: May 13, 2013
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: Pinellas
Presiding Judge: Anthony E. Porcelli
Presiding Judge: James S. Moody
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 21, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER denying 33 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 2/21/2014. (LN)
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER: Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Fourth Amended Quiet Title Complaint (Dkt. #30) is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' Fourth Amended Complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. The Clerk is directed to deny all pending motions as moot and close the case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 1/14/2014. (LN)
October 3, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER: Defendant Quicken Loans Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Third Amended Verified Complaint and For Injunctive Relief 19 is granted. Plaintiffs' Third Amended Verified Complaint is dismissed with prejudice as to QUICKEN LOANS, INC. Plaintiffs' Motion to Drop Party Defendant 15 is denied as moot. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 10/3/2013. (LN)
July 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER dismissing case without prejudice. All pending motions are denied as moot. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 7/10/2013. (LN)
June 12, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Defendant Quicken Loans Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Verified Complaint to Quiet Title 4 is GRANTED. The complaint is dismissed without prejudice to Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint that states a cause of action within 20 days of the date of this Order. If Plaintiffs fail to file a timely amended complaint, the Court will direct the Clerk to administratively close this case without further notice to the parties. Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr on 6/12/2013. (LN)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lane et al v. Quicken Loans Inc. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quicken Loans Inc.
Represented By: Julie S. Sneed
Represented By: Latasha C. Marshall-Scott
Represented By: William P. Heller
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Does
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jennifer L. Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joseph D. Lane
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?