Bingham v. BayCare Health System
| Thomas Bingham |
| BayCare Health System |
| United States of America and State of Florida |
| Peter J. Grilli |
| 8:2014cv00073 |
| January 13, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Tampa Office |
| Pinellas |
| Steven D. Merryday |
| Julie S. Sneed |
| False Claims Act |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
240
ORDER overruling 198 --objections; adopting 196 --REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS; denying 155 --Thomas Bingham's motion for partial summary judgment; granting 156 --BayCare Health System's motion for summary judgment; directing the cle rk to ENTER JUDGMENT against the plaintiff and for the defendant on each of the three counts of the amended complaint (Doc. 32 ), to TERMINATE any pending motion, and to CLOSE the case. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 4/18/2017. (BK)
|
|
Filing
195
ORDER denying 183 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 12/16/2016. (JR)
|
|
Filing
157
ORDER granting 152 Motion to Seal; granting 153 Motion for Leave to File Under Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 10/20/2016. (JR)
|
|
Filing
143
ORDER granting 135 Motion for Extension of Time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 9/21/2016. (JR)
|
|
Filing
141
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 128 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Supplemental Expert Disclosure Statement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 9/20/2016. (JR)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER denying 122 Motion to Compel West Florida Cardiology Network, LLC to Produce Documents Responsive to Non-Party Subpoena; granting in part and denying in part 123 Motion to Compel Production of Documents; granting in part and denying in part 126 Second Motion to Compel Production of Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 8/24/2016. (JR)
|
|
Filing
113
ORDER granting 94 Motion for a Determination That Certain E-Mail Communications Are Not Privileged or Otherwise Protected from Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 7/20/2016. (JR)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER granting 97 Motion for Protective Order; denying as moot 97 Motion to Stay Response Deadline. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 7/7/2016. (JR)
|
|
Filing
109
ORDER denying 99 Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Admission. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 7/5/2016. (JR)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 77 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 4/15/2016. (JR)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 68 Motion to Extend Time to File Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2) Expert Witness Disclosures. The deadline for expert disclosures for each party is extended by forty-five (45) days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 12/21/2015. (JR)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER denying without prejudice 53 Motion to Strike Objections and to Compel Production of Documents; denying without prejudice 60 Motion to Reset October 1 Hearing on Motion to Strike Objections and to Compel Production of Documents. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 9/30/2015. (JR)
|
|
Filing
54
ORDER denying 37 --motion to dismiss. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 8/14/2015. (BK)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER denying 47 Motion to stay discovery; denying 47 Motion for Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Julie S. Sneed on 7/24/2015. (JR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
