Dish Network L.L.C. v. Fraifer et al
Plaintiff: Dish Network L.L.C.
Defendant: Gaby Fraifer and Tele-Center, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2016cv02549
Filed: August 30, 2016
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Office: Tampa Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Elizabeth A. Kovachevich
Presiding Judge: Thomas B. McCoun
Nature of Suit: Copyrights
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 401 ORDER. The report and recommendation (Doc. 394) is affirmed and adopted and incorporated by reference into this Order for all purposes, including appellate review. "Defendants' Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment" (Doc. 377) is denied. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 1/4/2024. (EKB)
April 18, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 370 ORDER. "Defendants' Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal" (Doc. 344) is denied as moot. A permanent injunction is entered as set forth in the Order. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment in favor of Plaintiff DISH Network L.L.C., and against Defendants Gaby Fraifer, Tele-Center, Inc., and Planet Telecom, Inc., jointly and severally, in the amount of $600,000.00. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 4/18/2022. (EKB)
July 1, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 267 ORDER: "Defendants' Motion to Certify Decision for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) and to Stay Proceedings Pending Appeal" (Doc. 261) is denied. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 7/1/2020. (ZRN)
March 30, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 257 ORDER: Judge Tuite's January 31, 2020, Report and Recommendation (Doc. 246) is adopted and affirmed. "Plaintiff's Dispositive Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. 146) is granted in part and denied in part. "Defendants ' Amended Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I of Plaintiff's Amended Complaint" (Doc. 217) is denied. The Clerk is directed to enter judgment in Plaintiff's favor, and against Defendants, on all counts of the amended counterclaim. (Doc. 104). See Order for details. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 3/30/2020. (ZRN)
January 3, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 48 ORDER denying 26 Motion to Dismiss; denying 27 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Elizabeth A. Kovachevich on 1/3/2017. (KM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dish Network L.L.C. v. Fraifer et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dish Network L.L.C.
Represented By: James A. Boatman, Jr.
Represented By: Joseph H. Boyle
Represented By: Timothy M. Frank
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Gaby Fraifer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Tele-Center, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?