Progressive Express Insurance Company v. Anephna Transport Inc. et al
| Progressive Express Insurance Company |
| Anephna Transport Inc. and Lynn Joseph Simon, Jr. |
| 8:2018cv02318 |
| September 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
| Julie S Sneed |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by December 10, 2018, file a completed Case Management Report. This document can be found on Judge Covington's page of the Court's website at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. Please be advised that the Court's Case Management Report form is different from those used by other judges. Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(E), M.D. Fla., explains that most track two cases, like the present case, "will be tried within one year after the filing of the complaint." To accomplish this goal, the Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery. If the parties believe that more time than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. The Court will then determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/14/2018. (KAK)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF of service by Progressive Express Insurance Company (Frost, Jack) |
| Filing 9 RETURN of service executed on 11/10/2018 by Progressive Express Insurance Company as to Anephna Transport Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Service as to Defendant, Anephna Transport)(Frost, Jack) |
| Filing 8 STATUS report Regarding Plaintiff's Efforts to Serve Defendants by Progressive Express Insurance Company. (Frost, Jack) |
| Filing 7 WAIVER of service returned executed on 10/31/2018 by Progressive Express Insurance Company as to Lynn Joseph Simon, Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Executed Waiver of Service as to Lynn Joseph Simon as PR of the Estate of Matthew Joseph Simon)(Frost, Jack) |
|
Filing 6
ENDORSED ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to file a status report regarding the efforts undertaken to serve Defendants by November 13, 2018. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/5/2018. (KAK)
|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Progressive Express Insurance Company. Related case(s): No (Frost, Jack) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Plaintiff is directed to effect service of process as required by Rule 4, Fed. R. Civ. P., and file proof thereof with the Court as soon as service has been effected. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/26/2018. (TWL)
|
|
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 9/24/2018. (TWL)
|
| Filing 2 SUMMONS issued as to Anephna Transport Inc. (EA) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Anephna Transport Inc., Lynn Joseph Simon, Jr. with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number TPA053218) filed by Progressive Express Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Civil Cover Sheet)(EA) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
