Trevino v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Yajaira Elizabeth Trevino
Defendant: Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Case Number: 8:2019cv01136
Filed: May 10, 2019
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Hernandez Covington
Referring Judge: Christopher P Tuite
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Defendant
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ENDORSED ORDER: Pursuant to the joint stipulation to dismiss with prejudice (Doc. #7), this case is dismissed with prejudice with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions or deadlines and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/20/2019. (DMD)
May 20, 2019 Filing 7 STIPULATION of Dismissal WITH PREJUDICE by Amica Mutual Insurance Company. (Vaughn, Madeleine)
May 14, 2019 Filing 6 First MOTION to remand to State Court by Yajaira Elizabeth Trevino. (Joyce, Robert)
May 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/14/2019. (TWL)
May 13, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by May 28, 2019, file a completed Case Management Report. This document can be found on Judge Covington's page of the Court's website at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. Please be advised that the Court's Case Management Report form is different from those used by other judges. Local Rule 3.05(c)(2)(E), M.D. Fla., explains that most track two cases, like the present case, "will be tried within one year after the filing of the complaint." To accomplish this goal, the Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery. If the parties believe that more time than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. The Court will then determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/13/2019. (DMD)
May 10, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ENDORSED ORDER: On May 10, 2019, Defendant Amica Mutual Insurance Company removed this case from state court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. (Doc. #1). The Complaint does not specify the amount of damages sought, and when "damages are unspecified, the removing party bears the burden of establishing the jurisdictional amount by a preponderance of the evidence." Lowery v. Ala. Power Co., 483 F.3d 1184, 1208 (11th Cir. 2007). Amica relies in part on pre-suit demand letters demanding the combined $100,000 policy limits to establish that the amount in controversy exceeds the $75,000 jurisdictional threshold. But demand letters do not automatically establish the amount in controversy. Lamb v. State Farm Fire Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., No. 3:10-cv-615-J-32JRK, 2010 WL 6790539, at *2 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 5, 2010). Rather, courts evaluate whether demand letters "reflect puffing and posturing" or "whether they provide 'specific information to support the plaintiff's claim for damages.'" Lamb, 2010 WL 6790539, at *2 (quoting Jackson v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., 651 F. Supp. 2d 1279, 1281 (S.D. Ala. 2009)). Upon review of the demand letters here, the Court is not convinced that the demand letters are more than mere puffery. Additionally, the fact that Plaintiff has only incurred less than $6,000 in past medical expenses seriously undermines Amica's claim that the minimum amount in controversy is met. While one doctor noted that Plaintiff "may require surgery on her back in the future," which would cost an estimated $80,000, this future medical cost calculation is far too speculative to establish the amount in controversy by a preponderance of the evidence. Finally, the Court notes that Amica has not provided a calculation for Plaintiff's alleged lost wages or other economic damages. In short, at this juncture, the Court is not convinced that the amount in controversy requirement is met. Amica is directed to provide additional information establishing, if possible, that the amount in controversy requirement has been met by May 20, 2019. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 5/10/2019. (DMD)
May 10, 2019 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:19-cv-1136-T-33CPT. (SJB)
May 10, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT and NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Hillsborough County Thirteenth Judicial Circuit, case number 2019-CA-003028 filed in State Court on 03/21/2019. Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 113A-15453602 filed by Amica Mutual Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 State Court COMPLAINT, #2 State Court ANSWER, #3 State Court Docket Sheet, #4 State Court Other Documents, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Vaughn, Madeleine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Trevino v. Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Yajaira Elizabeth Trevino
Represented By: Robert Timothy Joyce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Amica Mutual Insurance Company
Represented By: Madeleine Camille Vaughn
Represented By: John Norris Cain, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?