Chapman v. Screenco, Inc. et al
| Robert Chapman |
| Screenco, Inc. and John P. Meyer, Jr. |
| 8:2019cv01165 |
| May 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| James S Moody |
| Anthony E Porcelli |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to court interrogatories re: #6 FLSA scheduling order by Robert Chapman. (Bober, Peter) |
Filing 6
FLSA SCHEDULING ORDER. Plaintiff shall answer the Court's interrogatories within 20 days. (See Order for additional details and instructions.) Signed by Judge James S. Moody, Jr. on 6/20/2019. (Attachments: #1 Magistrate Judge Consent Form)(SMB)
|
| Filing 5 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by John P. Meyer, Jr., Screenco, Inc..(Malatesta, Frank) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Frank Michael Malatesta on behalf of John P. Meyer, Jr., Screenco, Inc. (Malatesta, Frank) |
| Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to John P. Meyer, Jr., Screenco, Inc. (LSS) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge James S. Moody, Jr and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:19-cv-1165-T-30AEP. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15464211) filed by Robert Chapman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Bober, Peter) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
