Wismard v. United States of America
| Alfred Wismard |
| United States of America |
| 8:2019cv02217 |
| September 5, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Sean P Flynn |
| William F Jung |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 07 U.S.C. ยง 2023 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice. Plaintiff's Amended Notice of Pendency of Other Actions per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Alfred Wismard. Related case(s): no (Tapp, Andrew) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by United States of America. Related case(s): no (Stegeby, Erik) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice by United States of America. (Stegeby, Erik) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice. Plaintiff's Certificate of Interested Persons and Corporate Disclosure Statement of Plaintiff by Alfred Wismard. (Tapp, Andrew) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #3 Related case order and track 2 notice. Plaintiffs' Notice of Pendency of Other Actions per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Alfred Wismard. Related case(s): Yes-Admin Review by the USDA-FNS (Tapp, Andrew) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (LNR) |
Filing 3
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Counsel and any unrepresented party shall meet within sixty days after service of the complaint upon any defendant for the purpose of preparing and filing a Case Management Report. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 9/5/2019. (SAO)
|
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:19-cv-2217-T-02SPF. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-15883583) filed by Alfred Wismard. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Complaint, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Request for Issuance of Summons US Attorney Office-Middle Dist of FL, #4 Request for Issuance of Summons Attorney General of the U.S., #5 Request for Issuance of Summons - USDA-FNS, #6 Notice of Appearance)(Tapp, Andrew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Wismard v. United States of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Alfred Wismard | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Zachary Tapp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: United States of America | |
| Represented By: | Erik Kenneth Stegeby |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
