Myers v. Pratt et al
| Jeremy L. Myers |
| Thomas Pratt, Matthew C. Gish, Heather Myers and Heather L. Myers |
| 8:2019cv02576 |
| October 18, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT in favor of Heather L. Myers, Matthew C. Gish, Thomas Pratt against Jeremy L. Myers. Signed by Deputy Clerk on 11/5/2019. (JNB) |
Filing 4
ORDER denying as moot #2 Motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency. The complaint is dismissed and the Clerk is directed to enter judgment of dismissal against Plaintiff and to close the case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 11/4/2019. (SRC)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1 issued by Deputy Clerk on 10/21/2019. (SRC) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Jeremy L. Myers. (Attachments: #1 Inmate Account Statement, #2 Mailing Envelope)(WCD) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Matthew C. Gish, Heather Myers, Thomas Pratt filed by Jeremy L. Myers. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(WCD) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
