Xaymongkhonh v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Nhouphinh M Xaymongkhonh |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2019cv03056 |
| December 12, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| William F Jung |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 205 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 SUMMONS issued as to United States Attorney's Office, United States Attorney General, and Office of Regional Chief Counsel. (CRH) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 construed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 12/16/2019. (AHA)
|
|
Filing 4
RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 1. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 12/13/2019. (SAO)
|
| Filing 3 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:19-cv-3056-T-02CPT. Motion(s) REFERRED: #2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency . Motion(s) referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. (SJB) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for leave to proceed in forma pauperis/affidavit of indigency by Nhouphinh M Xaymongkhonh. (Escarraz, Enrique) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security filed by Nhouphinh M Xaymongkhonh. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Escarraz, Enrique) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
