MSM Trading, Inc. et al v. United States of America
Syeda Gulzar Jahan and MSM Trading, Inc. |
United States of America |
8:2020cv00705 |
March 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Sean P Flynn |
Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
Other Statutory Actions |
07 U.S.C. ยง 2023 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 26, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (MCB) |
Filing 4 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Syeda Gulzar Jahan, MSM Trading, Inc., a FL Corp d/b/a Charlie's Market. (Tapp, Andrew) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Zachary Tapp on behalf of Syeda Gulzar Jahan, MSM Trading, Inc., a FL Corp d/b/a Charlie's Market (Tapp, Andrew) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Sean P. Flynn. New case number: 8:20-cv-705-T-36SPF. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United States of America (Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 113A-16638307) filed by MSM Trading, Inc., Syeda Gulzar Jahan. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Request for Issuance of Summons-Attorney General of US, #4 Request for Issuance of Summons-Civil Process Clerk-U.S. Attorney's Office-Middle District of FL, #5 Request for Issuance of Summons-USDA-FNS)(Tapp, Andrew) Modified on 3/26/2020 (MCB). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.