Shaw v. Tampa Bay Adult Congenital Center et al
Aaron Levi Shaw |
Tampa Bay Adult Congenital Center and Joel Hardin |
8:2020cv02492 |
October 26, 2020 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
Christopher P Tuite |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re #3 Interested persons order by Aaron Levi Shaw. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
Filing 4 NOTICE of pendency of related cases re #2 Related case order and track 2 notice per Local Rule 1.04(d) by Aaron Levi Shaw. Related case(s): yes (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(MCB) |
Filing 3 INTERESTED PERSONS ORDER. Certificate of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement due by 11/10/2020. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 10/27/2020. (BGS) |
Filing 2 RELATED CASE ORDER AND NOTICE of designation under Local Rule 3.05 - track 2. Notice of pendency of other actions due by 11/10/2020. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 10/27/2020. (BGS) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joel Hardin, Tampa Bay Adult Congenital Center filed by Aaron Levi Shaw. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Subpoena, #4 Mailing Envelope)(Filing Fee Not Paid - No IFP Motion Filed.)(CRH) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.