United States of America v. Padula
| United States of America |
| Casey Padula and Casey Dan Padula |
| 8:2021cv01021 |
| April 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Steven D Merryday |
| Christopher P Tuite |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (GSO) |
| Filing 12 Defendant's ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Casey Dan Padula.(Fedor, Robert) |
Filing 11
ENDORSED ORDER granting Defendant's #7 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Robert J. Fedor, as supplemented by Defendant's #9 [Amended] Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Robert J. Fedor. If counsel has not already done so, within fourteen (14) days hereof, he shall pay the special admission fee to the Clerk of Court and complete the e-filer registration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on 6/3/2021. (CTB)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8--motion for an extension of time; extending through 6/15/2021 the time within which the defendant must respond to the complaint. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 6/2/2021. (BK)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION to Amend #7 MOTION for Robert Joseph Fedor to appear pro hac vice by Casey Dan Padula. (Fedor, Robert) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint by Casey Dan Padula. (Fedor, Robert) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for Robert Joseph Fedor to appear pro hac vice by Casey Dan Padula. (Fedor, Robert) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
| Filing 6 PROOF of service by United States of America (Esteban, Jordan) |
| Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Casey Dan Padula. (CTR) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE: COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 1.08. Signed by Judge Steven D. Merryday on 4/30/2021. (KR) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c) and Local Rule 3.02(a)(2): -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KR) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Steven D. Merryday and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:21-cv-1021-SDM-CPT. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Casey Padula filed by United States of America. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Summons, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Esteban, Jordan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
