Andre v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Plaintiff: Michelle Andre
Defendant: Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC and Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC doing business as ERC
Case Number: 8:2021cv01108
Filed: May 6, 2021
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William F Jung
Referring Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2021 Filing 15 Unopposed MOTION to Change Venue / Transfer Case by Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Gallagher, Scott)
June 23, 2021 Filing 14 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. Related case(s): Yes (Gallagher, Scott)
June 22, 2021 Filing 13 CASE MANAGEMENT REPORT. (Rivera, Richard)
June 1, 2021 Filing 12 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC identifying Other Affiliate ERC Holdings, LLC for Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. (Gallagher, Scott)
June 1, 2021 Filing 11 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint by Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC.(Gallagher, Scott)
May 11, 2021 Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 6 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Michelle Andre. (Shrader, Brian)
May 11, 2021 Filing 9 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Michelle Andre. Related case(s): No (Shrader, Brian)
May 11, 2021 Filing 8 RETURN of service executed on May 11, 2021 by Michelle Andre as to Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. (Shrader, Brian)
May 10, 2021 Filing 7 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SAO)
May 10, 2021 Filing 6 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SAO)
May 7, 2021 Filing 5 SUMMONS issued as to Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC. (LNR)
May 7, 2021 Filing 4 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge William F. Jung and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:21-cv-1108-WFJ-AEP. (SJB)
May 6, 2021 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Brian Lucas Shrader on behalf of Michelle Andre. (Shrader, Brian)
May 6, 2021 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Alejandro Jesus Mendez on behalf of Michelle Andre. (Mendez, Alejandro)
May 6, 2021 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-18224802) filed by Michelle Andre. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet, #3 Proposed Summons)(Yanes, Katherine)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andre v. Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michelle Andre
Represented By: Alejandro Jesus Mendez
Represented By: Brian Lucas Shrader
Represented By: Katherine Earle Yanes
Represented By: Gus M. Centrone
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Enhanced Recovery Company, LLC doing business as ERC
Represented By: Scott Stephen Gallagher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?