First Chicago Insurance Company v. Freeman et al
| First Chicago Insurance Company |
| Janet Freeman, Nyah Vernae Thorton and Kimberly Crockett |
| 8:2021cv02918 |
| December 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 SUMMONS issued as to Kimberly Crockett. (CTR) |
| Filing 14 PROPOSED summons to be issued by First Chicago Insurance Company. (Miller, Chandra) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS returned unexecuted by First Chicago Insurance Company as to Kimberly Crockett. (Miller, Chandra) |
| Filing 12 PROOF of service by First Chicago Insurance Company (Miller, Chandra) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS issued as to Kimberly Crockett, Janet Freeman, Nyah Vernae Thorton. (CTR) |
Filing 10
ORDER: The Court will take no further action on the Order to Show Cause #7, and it is discharged. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 1/3/2022. (GLP)
|
| Filing 9 AMENDED COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against All Defendants filed by First Chicago Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Miller, Chandra) Modified text on 1/3/2022 (MCB). |
| Filing 8 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by First Chicago Insurance Company. (Miller, Chandra) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: First Chicago Insurance Company must SHOW CAUSE as to why the Court should not dismiss this action, without prejudice, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. First Chicago must file a written response with the Court on or before January 4, 2022. And to the extent that First Chicago intends to maintain this action in federal court, First Chicago must also file an amended complaint that cures the deficiencies identified herein on or before January 4, 2022. Failure to file a written response and an amended complaint within the time provided will result in the dismissal of this action, without prejudice, without further notice. Signed by Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell on 12/20/2021. (GLP)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BGS) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to counsel Caroline R. Garrity of Local Rule 2.01(a), which requires membership or special admission in the Middle District bar to practice in the Middle District, except for the limited exceptions identified in the Rule. To apply for membership in the Middle District, visit www.flmd.uscourts.gov/for-lawyers. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Plaintiff's Counsels of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Charlene Edwards Honeywell and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:21-cv-2918-CEH-AAS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Declaratory Judgment against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number AFLMDC-19034694) filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Exhibit E, #7 Proposed Summons Janet Freeman, #8 Proposed Summons Nyah Vernae Thorton, #9 Proposed Summons Kimberly Crockett)(Miller, Chandra) Modified on 12/16/2021 to correct docket text (BD). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
