Lugo v. Monterey Condominium Motel Association, Inc.
Plaintiff: Daniel Lugo
Defendant: Monterey Condominium Motel Association, Inc.
Case Number: 8:2022cv00167
Filed: January 20, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Thomas P Barber
Referring Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other
Jury Demanded By: None
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ENDORSED ORDER: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) and the "Joint Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice" (Doc. #18), this case is dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 3/14/2022. (ANL)
March 14, 2022 Filing 18 STIPULATION of Dismissal with Prejudice by Monterey Condominium Motel Association, Inc.. (Wood, Rachael)
March 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ENDORSED ORDER: On the basis of the "Joint Notice of Settlement" (Doc. #16), this cause is hereby dismissed without prejudice, subject to the right of the parties within 60 days of the date hereof, to submit a stipulated form of final order or judgment, or request an extension of time, should they so choose, or for any party to move to reopen the action, upon good cause being shown. After that 60 day period, however, without further order, this dismissal shall be deemed with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to terminate any pending motions and deadlines, and thereafter close this case. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 3/4/2022. (ANL)
March 4, 2022 Filing 16 NOTICE of settlement by Monterey Condominium Motel Association, Inc. (Wood, Rachael)
February 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ADA SCHEDULING ORDER - FAST TRACK. The parties shall mediate no later than MAY 5, 2022. On or before MARCH 25, 2022, Plaintiff's counsel shall file a notice of mediation that states the agreed date and time of mediation and name of mediator selected by parties. If mediation results in an impasse, the Court intends to schedule this action for trial within 90-120 days from the mediation conference. See order for further details. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 2/23/2022. (SRC)
February 16, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ENDORSED ORDER: "Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint" (Doc. #13) is granted. Defendant may file its response to the complaint on or before March 11, 2022. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 2/16/2022. (ANL)
February 15, 2022 Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Monterey Condominium Motel Association, Inc. (Wood, Rachael) Modified text on 2/16/2022 (ABC).
February 15, 2022 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Monterey Condominium Motel Association, Inc. (Wood, Rachael) Modified text on 2/16/2022 (ABC).
February 15, 2022 Filing 11 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Monterey Condominium Motel Association, Inc. Related case(s): No (Wood, Rachael) Modified text on 2/16/2022 (ABC).
February 15, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Rachael Lynne Wood on behalf of Monterey Condominium Motel Association, Inc. Lead Counsel: Rachael L. Wood. (Wood, Rachael) Modified text on 2/16/2022 (ABC).
January 25, 2022 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement re 6 Notice to Counsel of Local Rule by Daniel Lugo. (Sarkin, Lee)
January 25, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Daniel Lugo. Related case(s): No (Sarkin, Lee)
January 25, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE to Counsel informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC)
January 25, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE to Counsel of Local Rule 1.07(c), Local Rule 3.02(a)(2), and Local Rule 3.03. -Local Rule 1.07(c) requires lead counsel to promptly file a Notice of a Related Action that identifies and describes any related action pending in the Middle District or elsewhere. -Local Rule 3.02(a)(2) requires the parties in every civil proceeding, except those described in subsection (d), to file a case management report (CMR) using the uniform form at www.flmd.uscourts.gov. The CMR must be filed (1) within forty days after any defendant appears in an action originating in this court, (2) within forty days after the docketing of an action removed or transferred to this court, or (3) within seventy days after service on the United States attorney in an action against the United States, its agencies or employees. Judges may have a special CMR form for certain types of cases. These forms can be found at www.flmd.uscourts.gov under the Forms tab for each judge. -Local Rule 3.03 requires each party to file a disclosure statement with the first appearance that identifies (1) each person that has or might have an interest in the outcome, (2) each entity with publicly traded shares or debt potentially affected by the outcome, (3) each additional entity likely to actively participate, and (4) each person arguably eligible for restitution. The disclosure statement must include this certification - I certify that, except as disclosed, I am unaware of an actual or potential conflict of interest affecting the district judge or the magistrate judge in this action, and I will immediately notify the judge in writing within fourteen days after I know of a conflict. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC)
January 21, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Lee David Sarkin on behalf of Daniel Lugo. Lead Counsel: Drew M Levitt. (Sarkin, Lee)
January 21, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (BD)
January 21, 2022 Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to Monterey Condominium Motel Association, Inc. (BD)
January 20, 2022 Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli. New case number: 8:22-cv-0167-TPB-AEP. (SJB)
January 20, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-19141587) filed by Daniel Lugo. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons)(Sarkin, Lee) Modified on 1/21/2022 to correct docket text (BD).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lugo v. Monterey Condominium Motel Association, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Lugo
Represented By: Lee David Sarkin
Represented By: Drew M. Levitt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Monterey Condominium Motel Association, Inc.
Represented By: Rachael Lynne Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?