Brown v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
Oliver Brown |
Florida Department of Corrections, Hardy Correctional Institution, Wakulla Correctional Institution, Calhoun Correctional Institution, Santa Rosa Correctional Institution, Sumter Correctional Institution, South Bay Correctional Institution, West Ford Medical Health Care, Verizon Medical Health Care, GEO Incorporation, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Westford Medical Health Care |
8:2022cv00948 |
April 22, 2022 |
U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Charlene Edwards Honeywell |
Christopher P Tuite |
Prisoner Civil Rights (Prison Condition) |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 2 MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis / Affidavit of Indigency by Oliver Brown. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SEG) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Calhoun Correctional Institution, Florida Department of Corrections, GEO Incorporation, Hardy Correctional Institution, Santa Rosa Correctional Institution, South Bay Correctional Institution, Sumter Correctional Institution, Verizon Medical Health Care, Wakulla Correctional Institution, West Ford Medical Health Care filed by Oliver Brown. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(SEG) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.