Williams v. R.T.G. Furniture Corp. et al
TONY WILLIAMS |
R.T.G. Furniture Corp. doing business as Rooms to Go, SE Independent Delivery Services, Inc. and R.T.G. Furniture Corp. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Rooms to Go |
8:2022cv02330 |
October 11, 2022 |
US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
Virginia M Hernandez Covington |
Christopher P Tuite |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by December 16, 2022, file a completed Case Management Report. The Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery in the vast majority of cases. If the parties believe that more than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. After the Case Management Report is filed, the Court will determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/6/2022. (DRG) |
Filing 12 PROOF of service by Tony Williams (Seldin, Corey) |
Filing 11 PROOF of service by Tony Williams (Seldin, Corey) |
Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel for Defendants R.T.G. Furniture Corp. and SE Independent Delivery Services, Inc., have appeared, but Plaintiff has not yet filed the return of service, or proof of waiver, as required under the Rules. Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to file either the return of service or proof of waiver by December 6, 2022, so that the Court may accurately determine when Defendant's responses to the Complaint are due. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/5/2022. (DRG) |
Filing 9 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint, by R.T.G. Furniture Corp.(Harris, Phillip) Modified on 11/21/2022 (CTR). |
Filing 8 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by SE Independent Delivery Services, Inc.. (Cascino, Christopher) |
Filing 7 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint, by SE Independent Delivery Services, Inc..(Cascino, Christopher) |
Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response / Reply. Response is due by November 21, 2022. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/12/2022. (Covington, Virginia) |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by R.T.G. Furniture Corp. (Harris, Phillip) Modified text on 11/14/2022 (MCB). |
Filing 4 NOTICE to counsel Corey Logan Seldin of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CTR) |
Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to R.T.G. Furniture Corp., SE Independent Delivery Services, Inc. (CTR) |
Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:22-cv-2330-VMC-CPT. (SJB) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20078487) filed by TONY WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Seldin, Corey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.