Williams v. R.T.G. Furniture Corp. et al
Plaintiff: TONY WILLIAMS
Defendant: R.T.G. Furniture Corp. doing business as Rooms to Go, SE Independent Delivery Services, Inc. and R.T.G. Furniture Corp. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Rooms to Go
Case Number: 8:2022cv02330
Filed: October 11, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: Virginia M Hernandez Covington
Referring Judge: Christopher P Tuite
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel are directed to meet and confer, in person or by telephone, and by December 16, 2022, file a completed Case Management Report. The Court believes that six to eight months is a sufficient period of time to conduct discovery in the vast majority of cases. If the parties believe that more than eight months will be needed to complete discovery, the parties should provide the Court with a detailed explanation as to why additional time is needed and a timeline for the discovery that is planned. After the Case Management Report is filed, the Court will determine whether a Case Management Hearing is necessary before entry of a Case Management and Scheduling Order. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/6/2022. (DRG)
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 PROOF of service by Tony Williams (Seldin, Corey)
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 PROOF of service by Tony Williams (Seldin, Corey)
December 5, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ENDORSED ORDER: Counsel for Defendants R.T.G. Furniture Corp. and SE Independent Delivery Services, Inc., have appeared, but Plaintiff has not yet filed the return of service, or proof of waiver, as required under the Rules. Accordingly, Plaintiff is directed to file either the return of service or proof of waiver by December 6, 2022, so that the Court may accurately determine when Defendant's responses to the Complaint are due. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 12/5/2022. (DRG)
November 21, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint, by R.T.G. Furniture Corp.(Harris, Phillip) Modified on 11/21/2022 (CTR).
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 8 CORPORATE Disclosure Statement by SE Independent Delivery Services, Inc.. (Cascino, Christopher)
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ANSWER and affirmative defenses to #1 Complaint, by SE Independent Delivery Services, Inc..(Cascino, Christopher)
November 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response / Reply. Response is due by November 21, 2022. Signed by Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington on 11/12/2022. (Covington, Virginia)
November 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Complaint, by R.T.G. Furniture Corp. (Harris, Phillip) Modified text on 11/14/2022 (MCB).
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 NOTICE to counsel Corey Logan Seldin of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (CTR)
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 SUMMONS issued as to R.T.G. Furniture Corp., SE Independent Delivery Services, Inc. (CTR)
October 12, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Virginia M. Hernandez Covington and Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite. New case number: 8:22-cv-2330-VMC-CPT. (SJB)
October 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20078487) filed by TONY WILLIAMS. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Proposed Summons)(Seldin, Corey)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Williams v. R.T.G. Furniture Corp. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TONY WILLIAMS
Represented By: Corey Logan Seldin
Represented By: Peter Michael Hoogerwoerd
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R.T.G. Furniture Corp. doing business as Rooms to Go
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SE Independent Delivery Services, Inc.
Represented By: Christopher M. Cascino
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: R.T.G. Furniture Corp. a Florida Profit Corporation doing business as Rooms to Go
Represented By: Phillip J. Harris
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?