Hage v. Equifax Information Services LLC
| Victoria R Hage and Victoria R. Hage |
| Equifax Information Services LLC |
| 8:2022cv02738 |
| December 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Thomas P Barber |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
ENDORSED ORDER: "Equifax Information Services LLC's Second Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint" (Doc. #14) is granted. Equifax may file its response to the complaint on or before February 7, 2023. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 1/20/2023. (EKB)
|
| Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Joffe, Jason) |
| Filing 13 RETURN of service executed on 12.05.22 by Victoria R. Hage as to Equifax Information Services LLC. (Dubbeld, Jon) |
|
Filing 12
ENDORSED ORDER: "Equifax Information Services LLC's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint" (Doc. #9) is granted. Equifax may file its response to the complaint on or before January 17, 2023. Signed by Judge Thomas P. Barber on 12/27/2022. (EKB)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Equifax Information Services LLC. Related case(s): No (Joffe, Jason) |
| Filing 10 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Equifax Information Services LLC identifying Corporate Parent Equifax Inc. for Equifax Information Services LLC. (Joffe, Jason) |
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by Equifax Information Services LLC. (Joffe, Jason) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE informing the parties that they may consent to the jurisdiction of a United States magistrate judge by filing Form AO 85 Notice, Consent, and Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge using the event Consent to Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (SRC) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Victoria R. Hage. (Swift, Aaron) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Victoria R. Hage. Related case(s): Yes (Swift, Aaron) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Aaron M. Swift on behalf of Victoria R. Hage. Lead Counsel: Aaron M. Swift. (Swift, Aaron) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS issued as to Equifax Information Services LLC. (KME) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Plaintiff counsel of Local Rule 2.02(a), which requires designation of one lead counsel who - unless the party changes the designation - remains lead counsel throughout the action. File a Notice of Lead Counsel Designation to identify lead counsel. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (KME) |
| Filing 2 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Judge Thomas P. Barber and Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:22-cv-2738-TPB-AAS. (SJB) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Equifax Information Services LLC with Jury Demand (Filing fee $402 receipt number AFLMDC-20257062) filed by Victoria R. Hage. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons as to Equifax Information Services LLC, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Exhibit E, #8 Exhibit F, #9 Exhibit G)(Swift, Aaron) Modified text on 12/2/2022 (KME). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
