Veamcast Corp. v. Mclaren et al
Plaintiff: Veamcast Corp.
Defendant: Scott Mclaren and Hill Ward Henderson
Interested Party: Joseph Dean
Case Number: 8:2024cv02112
Filed: September 6, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida
Presiding Judge: William F Jung
Referring Judge: Anthony E Porcelli
Nature of Suit: Anti-Trust
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 23, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE of Filing Letter to Court by Joseph Dean. (e-portal) (GL)
September 16, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Local Rule 1.11(e), which provides that, unless an order states another time, a seal under Rule 1.11 expires ninety days after a case is closed and all appeals are exhausted. To prevent the content of a sealed item from appearing on the docket after the seal expires, a party or interested non-party must move for relief before the seal expires. (Signed by Deputy Clerk). (ELA)
September 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ENDORSED ORDER granting #5 Motion to Dismiss. The Clerk will close this file. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 9/16/2024. (Jung, William)
September 12, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss Case by Joseph Dean, Veamcast Corp. (AA) (e-portal)
September 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ENDORSED ORDER finding as moot #2 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 9/12/2024. (Jung, William)
September 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ENDORSED ORDER dismissing complaint. The Complaint does not state a cause of action. Also a corporation may not appear without being represented by Legal Counsel. Plaintiff may correct these matters within 21 days, and if no amended complaint correcting these matters is filed the Court will close the case. Signed by Judge William F. Jung on 9/12/2024. (Jung, William)
September 9, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Joseph Dean, Veamcast Corp.. (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope)(AA) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Anthony E. Porcelli.
September 6, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Hill Ward Henderson, Scott Mclaren filed by Veamcast Corp. (Filing fee: Not paid. No IFP motion filed). (Attachments: #1 Mailing Envelope), #2 Exhibit Cover Letter) (LSS).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Veamcast Corp. v. Mclaren et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Veamcast Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Scott Mclaren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hill Ward Henderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Joseph Dean
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?