Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Rhonda Tylissia Williams |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| SSA |
| 8:2024cv02814 |
| December 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Middle District of Florida |
| Amanda Arnold Sansone |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone on 12/6/2024. (BEE)
|
| Filing 6 NEW CASE ASSIGNED to Magistrate Judge Amanda Arnold Sansone. New case number: 8:24-cv-2814-AAS. (RPB) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of a related action per Local Rule 1.07(c) by Rhonda Tylissia Williams. Related case(s): No (Berger, Erik) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE of interested persons and corporate disclosure statement by Rhonda Tylissia Williams. (Berger, Erik) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Lead Counsel Designation by Erik William Berger on behalf of Rhonda Tylissia Williams. Lead Counsel: Erik W. Berger. (Berger, Erik) |
| Filing 2 First MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Rhonda Tylissia Williams. (Berger, Erik) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security. The plaintiff CONSENTS to jurisdiction of the United States magistrate judge filed by Rhonda Tylissia Williams. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Berger, Erik) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Middle District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
