Case Number: 1:2006cv00195
Filed: September 28, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Gainesville Office
Presiding Judge: ALLAN KORNBLUM
Presiding Judge: MAURICE M PAUL
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 29, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 60 Report and Recommendation; GRANTING 49 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING 52 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING 56 Motion to Dismiss; GRANTING 59 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE MAURICE M PAUL on 12/29/2008. Plaintiffs complaint, Doc. 1 , is DISMISSED as barred by Heck v. Humphrey and by the abstention doctrine. (kdm)
November 25, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 60 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 1 Complaint, 49 First MOTION to Dismiss, 52 First MOTION to Dismiss , 56 First MOTION to Dismiss , 59 First MOTION to Dismiss : It is recommended that Defendants motions (docs. 49 , 52 , 56 , and 59 ) be GRANTED, and Plaintiffs complaint (doc. 1 ), be DISMISSED as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, and barred by the abstention doctrine because there are ongoing state court proceedings raising the same issues. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ALLAN KORNBLUM on 11/25/2008. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 12/23/2008. (kdm)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SMITH v. DICKENS et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?