AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR METABOLIC AND BARIATRIC SURGERY V SURGICAL REVIEW CORPORATION
| AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR METABOLIC AND BARIATRIC SURGERY |
| SURGICAL REVIEW CORPORATION |
| 1:2011cv00282 |
| December 29, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Gainesville Office |
| Alachua |
| GARY R JONES |
| MAURICE M PAUL |
| Recovery of Overpayment and Enforcement of Judgment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 |
| None |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR METABOLIC AND BARIATRIC SURGERY V SURGICAL REVIEW CORPORATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SURGICAL REVIEW CORPORATION | |
| Represented By: | JOHNNY MORGAN LOPER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR METABOLIC AND BARIATRIC SURGERY | |
| Represented By: | MARK S THOMAS |
| Represented By: | JENNIFER CATES LESTER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
