SANMIGUEL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff: EDGARDO SANMIGUEL
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Case Number: 1:2022cv00321
Filed: November 22, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Presiding Judge: MARTIN A FITZPATRICK
Referring Judge: ALLEN C WINSOR
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 206 Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis #2 is GRANTED. Plaintiff is not required to pay the filing fee. The Clerk is DIRECTED to send a Notice of Electronic Filing of the complaint to the appropriate office within the Social Security Administrative Office of General Counsel and to the United States Attorney for this District. The clerk of court is also DIRECTED to send to the parties a form for consenting to magistrate judge jurisdiction. After the Defendant responds to Plaintiff's Complaint, the Court will enter an Order directing the parties to file memoranda of law addressing the issues in this case. Plaintiff will be required to submit the first memorandum but is advised that a separate Order will be entered providing additional guidance and deadlines for filing the memoranda. The Clerk of Court shall return this case upon the filing of Defendant's answer or other response to the Complaint. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 12/01/2022. (tpm) (NEF sent to Social Security Administrative Office and United States Attorney's Office. Form provided as directed) Modified to add hyperlink on 12/7/2022 (tpm).
November 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The motion for leave to appear pro hac vice, ECF No. #3 , is GRANTED. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK on 11/28/2022. (tpm)
November 22, 2022 Filing 4 CIVIL COVER SHEET. (bkp)
November 22, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Debra S Shifrin.( Filing fee $ 208 receipt number AFLNDC-7570332.) by Edgardo SanMiguel. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Certificate of Good Standing) (SHIFRIN, DEBRA)
November 22, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Edgardo SanMiguel. (SHIFRIN, DEBRA)
November 22, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, filed by Edgardo SanMiguel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (SHIFRIN, DEBRA) Modified on 11/22/2022 (bkp).
November 22, 2022 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE MARTIN A FITZPATRICK notified that action is needed Re: #3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Debra S Shifrin.( Filing fee $ 208 receipt number AFLNDC-7570332.), #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis . Referred to MARTIN A FITZPATRICK. (bkp)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: SANMIGUEL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: EDGARDO SANMIGUEL
Represented By: DEBRA SUE SHIFRIN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?