ANAZONWU et al v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA INC et al
3:2005cv00147 |
April 25, 2005 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Pensacola Office |
M CASEY RODGERS |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
Motor Vehicle Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 64 ORDER -GRANTED 60 Motion for Reconsideration. The order of dismissal (doc #58) is hereby VACATED. This action shall be REINSTATED to the active docket. This matter shall be referred to the magistrate judge to conduct an evidentiary hearing and/or s uch other proceedings as are required to determine whether plaintiffs' counsel has in fact located and made contact with plaintiffs as ordered, determine the sufficiency of the discovery responses and expert designations, develop a proposed discovery plan for this case, and to enter a report and recommendation on the findings . Signed by Judge M CASEY RODGERS. (tnc, Pensacola) |
Filing 58 ORDER DISMISSING CASE without prejudice. Signed by Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 3/30/2006. (tnc, Pensacola) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: ANAZONWU et al v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA INC et al | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.