GIDDINGS v. ASTRUE
Plaintiff: SUZANNE GIDDINGS
Defendant: MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Case Number: 3:2007cv00205
Filed: May 16, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Pensacola Office
County: Escambia
Presiding Judge: MILES DAVIS
Presiding Judge: M CASEY RODGERS
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 43 Order, Report and Recommendation. - Pltf's 36 Motion for Authorization of Attorney Fees is granted and Commissioner shall disburse the sum of $22,060.50 to Pltf' ;s counsel, Stephanie Taylor, Esq, as reasonable attorney fees under Title 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). - Pltf's counsel shall pay over to pltf, SUZANNE GIDDINGS, any amount (other than costs and expenses) paid to her under the EAJA. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on April 22, 2009.(cc: mailed to AUSA BLONDEAU) (cbj)
March 20, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 43 SECOND ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) 1. ORDERED that the 39 Report and Recommendation in this case dated March 13, 2009 is hereby VACATED, and 2. I t is respectfully RECOMMENDED that: i. The motion for authorization of attorney fees (doc 36 ) be granted and that the court order the Commissioner to disburse the sum of $22,060.50 to plaintiffs counsel, Stephanie Taylor, Esq., as reasona ble attorney fees under Title 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). ii. The court orders plaintiff's counsel to pay over to the plaintiff, Suzanne Giddings, any amount (other than costs and expenses) paid to her under the EAJA. Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 4/17/2009. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on March 20, 2009.(cc: mailed to AUSA Blondeau) (cbj)
March 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: (1.) It is ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation in this case dated December 12, 2008 (doc. 35 ) is hereby VACATED and (2.) It is respectfully RECOMMENDED that the motions for authoriz ation of attorney fees (docs. 24 , 36 ) be granted to the extent set out below, and that the court (i.) Order the Commissioner to disburse the sum of $22,060.50 to plaintiff's counsel, Stephanie Taylor, Esq., as reasonableattorney fee s under Title 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), and (ii.) Order that defendant pay counsel $350 from the Judgment Fund as costs under the EAJA. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS on 3/13/2009.(Internal deadline for referral to district judge if objections are not filed earlier: 4/10/2009.) (djb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: GIDDINGS v. ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: SUZANNE GIDDINGS
Represented By: STEPHANIE ANN TAYLOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL J ASTRUE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?