DOE et al v. SCHOOL BOARD FOR SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA et al
Plaintiffs alleged that school officials from the Defendant School Board for Santa Rosa County persistently and pervasively promoted their personal religious beliefs in the public schools and at school events.
Plaintiff: |
MINOR I DOE and MINOR II DOE |
Defendant: |
SCHOOL BOARD FOR SANTA ROSA COUNTY, FLORIDA, H. FRANK LAY and JOHN ROGERS |
Case Number: |
3:2008cv00361 |
Filed: |
August 27, 2008 |
Court: |
U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Office: |
Civil Rights: Other Office |
County: |
Santa Rosa |
Presiding Judge: |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Presiding Judge: |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
Nature of Suit: |
None |
Cause of Action: |
Federal Question |
Jury Demanded By: |
28:1983 Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
May 6, 2010 |
Filing
288
ORDER - - CEAI's 260 Motion for Reconsideration of Order Requesting Memoranda on Mootness is Denied. - - Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on May 6, 2010. (cbj)
|
November 25, 2009 |
Filing
210
ORDER re 209 MOTION in Limine. CEAI shall file its response to the plaintiffs' motion on or before November 30, 2009, by 12:00 Noon (Central Time). (Response to motion due by 11/30/2009). Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 11/25/09. (lcu)
|
October 30, 2009 |
Filing
190
ORDER - The plaintiffs' 182 Motion to Strike Christian Educators' intervention pleading is GRANTED as to the First and Second Affirmative Defenses, and as to the Third Affirmative Defense insofar as it seeks to vacate o r set aside the consent decree in its entirety, and DENIED as to that portion of the Third Affirmative Defense which seeks to amend or correct the consent decree to avoid a prior restraint on its members' First or FourteenthAmendment rights. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 10/30/2009. (djb)
|
August 18, 2009 |
Filing
157
ORDER - Granting Pla's 150 Motion to Compel Production, and Winkler must comply as directed. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 8/18/2009. (laj)
|
January 21, 2009 |
Filing
55
ORDER - No later than February 13, 2009, but sooner if possible, the parties shall file a joint report advising the court of the progress they have made towards fashioning a proposed consent decree in this case. If the parties have reached full agreement as to the terms of the proposed consent decree, along with their joint report they shall also submit a copy of the proposed consent decree to the court for its review and approval. If the parties have not reached full agreemen t as to the terms of the proposed consent decree, they shall so advise the court in their joint report and identify the area(s) of disagreement. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 1/21/2009. (Joint Report due by 2/13/2009.) (djb)
|
January 9, 2009 |
Filing
48
ORDER - Re: 47 Scheduling Conference - 1) This temporary injuction becomes effective at 12:00 p.m., 1/19/2009. The injunction will remain in effect for a period of (90) days or until further notice by the Court. 2) This ma tter will be referred to Magistrate Judge Elizabeth M. Timothy by separate Order, with instructions and a timetable for supervising the parties' efforts to fashion permanent relief in the form of a consent decree. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 1/9/2009. (laj)
|
December 10, 2008 |
Filing
41
ORDER - The courts order dated December 10, 2008, (doc. 38 ) granting defendants Motion to Vacate Protective Order to Proceed Pseudononymously is hereby VACATED. Defendants Motion to Vacate Protective Order to Proceed Pseudononymo usly (doc. 34 ) is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to refund any fees associated with the 39 Notice of Appeal of the vacated order. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on 12/10/2008. (djb) (copy (pdf) of this order emailed to Tallahassee Finance Office.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?