SULLIVAN v. NEE et al
| KATHLEEN SULLIVAN |
| PAUL NEE and EPAYMENT CONSULTANTS LLC |
| 3:2008cv00486 |
| October 22, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Contract: Other Office |
| Okaloosa |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Plaintiff |
| Diversity |
| 28:1346 Breach of Contract |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
88
ORDER - 1.) Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 57 ) is DENIED. 2.) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 61 ) is GRANTED. 3.) Consistent with this order, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter summa ry judgment in favor of Defendant EPAYMENT CONSULTANTS, LLC. Plaintiff shall take nothing further by this action and goes without day. 4.) Plaintiff's Motions To Amend Complaint and for Joinder (docs. 44 , 48 , 56 ) are DENIED. 5.) All remaining pending motions are DENIED as moot. As all claims are resolved as against all parties in this case, the Clerk of Court is directed to enter final judgment and close this case. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 7/17/2009. (djb)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment (Doc. 57 ) and Defendant Epayment Consultants, LLC's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 61 ) will be taken under advisement by the Court on June 23, 2009. Signed by SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER on 6/1/2009. (Miscellaneous Deadline - by 6/23/2009.) (djb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
