UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ABBOTT et al
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
CHARLES DENNIS ABBOTT and JACKIE ABBOTT |
3:2010cv00332 |
September 2, 2010 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Pensacola Office |
Escambia |
MILES DAVIS |
M CASEY RODGERS |
Taxes (US Plaintiff or Defendant) |
26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CONSENT FINAL JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANTS CHARLES DENNIS ABBOTT AND JACKIE ABBOTT. A recordable Consent Final Judgment be entered in favor of the United States of America and against dfts CHARLES DENNIS ABBOTT and JACKIE ABBOTT to reduce tax liabilities in the amount of $269,813.46 as of March 31, 2011, for joint and several income tax liabilities plus statutory accruals and interest. A recordable Consent Final Judgment be entered in favor of the United States of America and against dft CHARLES DENNIS ABBOTT in the amount of $12,684.95 as of March 31, 2011, for federal employment and unemployment tax liabilities. Each party bear its own costs and attorney's fees. Signed by District Judge M CASEY RODGERS on April 11, 2011. (kvg) Modified on 4/12/2011 (kvg). |
Filing 11 ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER: MAGISTRATE JUDGE MILES DAVIS no longer assigned to case. MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES J KAHN assigned per Administrative Order 4:95-mc-40111-DJ. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE STEPHAN P MICKLE on 3/7/2011. (jws) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.