MANNING v. HALL
Plaintiff: JAMES M MANNING, JR
Defendant: WENDELL HALL
Case Number: 3:2011cv00224
Filed: May 10, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Northern District of Florida
Office: Pensacola Office
County: Santa Rosa
Presiding Judge: WILLIAM STAFFORD
Presiding Judge: ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 15, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. ADOPTING 13 Report and Recommendation. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "All claims are DISMISSED with prejudice for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) (2)(B)(ii). Signed by SENIOR JUDGE WILLIAM STAFFORD on 8/15/11. (pll)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: MANNING v. HALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WENDELL HALL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JAMES M MANNING, JR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?