RUIZ v. OSTEEN
| CARLOS RUIZ |
| M NICHOL, INSPECTOR GENERAL, SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, CASTLE, J HAAS, TIFFT, W D RUMMEL, COLEMAN, OSTEEN, J M GAYNOR and BEAVER |
| 3:2012cv00240 |
| May 23, 2012 |
| U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Santa Rosa |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
200
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 196 Report and Recommendation. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as malicious and abusive of the judicial process, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). All pen ding motions are DENIED as moot. All deficient documents shall be returned to Plaintiff without filing. The clerk is directed to close this file. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 11/7/2013. (all deficient doc's returned with order) (djb) Modified on 11/7/2013 (djb).
|
|
Filing
171
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 162 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 161 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 5/21/2013. (djb)
|
|
Filing
166
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 153 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's 146 Motion for Preliminary and Restraining Order is DENIED without prejudice as moot. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 5/9/2013. (djb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
