BROWER v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
Plaintiff:
RONDA BROWER
Case Number:
3:2013cv00016
Filed:
January 10, 2013
Court:
Florida Northern District Court
Office:
Pensacola Office
County:
Escambia
Presiding Judge:
M CASEY RODGERS
Referring Judge:
CHARLES J KAHN
Nature of Suit:
Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action:
28:1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Jury Demanded By:
Both
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: BROWER v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY | |
| Represented By: | ADRIANNA SPAIN |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: RONDA BROWER | |
| Represented By: | DANIEL MARK SOLOWAY |
| Represented By: | GREGORY LEE WARNER |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.