JACKSON v. CREWS et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|October 7, 2014
ORDER adopting the Magistrate Judge's 129 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants' motion to dismiss (doc. 115 ) is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for plaintiff's failure to state a cla im upon which relief may be granted (failure to properly exhaust available administrative remedies). The Clerk is directed to close the file. Plaintiff's request that he not be required to pay a second filing fee should he re-file this action (doc. 120 , p. 10) is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 10/07/2014. (MB)
|June 6, 2014
ORDER Adopting the Magistrate's 107 Report and Recommendation. Defendants' motion to dismiss Plaintiff's first amended complaint (doc. 29 , adopted by docs. 40 , 65 , 69 ), is DENIED AS MOOT in light of Plain tiffs filing a 105 second amended complaint. Plaintiff's motion to voluntarily dismiss the claims against Defendant Michael Crews asserted in Plaintiff's first amended complaint (doc. 58 ) is DENIED AS MOOT in light of Plaintiff's filing a second amended complaint. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 06/06/2014. (MB)
|March 13, 2014
ORDER adopting the magistrate judge's 90 Report and Recommendation. The Plaintiff's 84 Motion for Temporary Injunction is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 3/13/2014. (djb)
|July 2, 2013
ORDER adopting 11 Report and Recommendation.The pla's motions for a temporary preliminary injunction (docs. 2 , 5 ) are DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on July 2, 2013. (kvg)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?