HARRY v. NICHOLS et al
| NAIL A HARRY |
| M NICHOLS, L BRADY, CORIZON HEALTH SERVICES, C COURTNEY, BEAVER, BUTLER, S SCHWARTZ, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2 |
| 3:2017cv00328 |
| May 8, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Santa Rosa |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| CHARLES J KAHN |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
79
ORDER ADOPTING 77 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. This action be DISMISSED under Rule 25(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 7/3/2019. (sdw)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER ADOPTING 45 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendants' motion to dismiss the amended complaint (doc. 35 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Plaintiff's medical malpractice claim against defendants Corizon, Nich ols, and Brady is DISMISSED. This matter is referred to the assigned Magistrate Judge for further proceedings on plaintiff's Eighth Amendment claim against defendants Nichols and Brady. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 9/20/2018. (sdw)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER ADOPTING 16 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Plaintiff's motion for temporary restraining order, ECF No. 14 , is DENIED. Signed by CHIEF JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 11/8/2017. (sdw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
