BLACKMAN v. CLAY'S HAULING LLC et al
MARK BLACKMAN |
CLAY'S HAULING LLC and ROBERT CLAY, SR |
3:2017cv00456 |
July 6, 2017 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
Pensacola Office |
Escambia |
M CASEY RODGERS |
CHARLES J KAHN |
Fair Labor Standards Act |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 71 ORDER ADOPTING 69 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Defendant Clay's Motion to Dismiss Claims, ECF No. 66 , Motion to File Claim, ECF No. 67 , and Motion to File Claim, ECF No. 68 , are DENIED. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 7/30/2019. (sdw) |
Filing 41 ORDER adopting Magistrate Judge's REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Counts 2 and 3 of the complaint are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE against Defendants Clay's Hauling, LLC, and Robert Clay, Sr. Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 5/30/2019. (MB) |
Filing 17 ORDER adopting 15 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Final Judgment, ECF No. 11 , is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Motion for Entitlement to and Award of Attorneys' Fees and Costs, ECF Nos. 12 , 14 , is GRANTED IN PART. The clerk is directed to enter a default final judgment as to the FLSA claim in favor of Plaintiff and against Clay's Hauling LLC in the amount of $30,600, plus an award of reasonable attorney's fees and costs in Plaintiff's favor in the amount of $3,425.96 (representing $2,940 in attorney's fees and $485.96 as costs). Signed by JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS on 3/25/2019. (sdw) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.