TEKLE v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
| TEDROS TEKLE |
| OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD |
| 3:2018cv01914 |
| August 16, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| Pensacola Office |
| Escambia |
| GARY R JONES |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| Personal Injury: Health Care/Pharmaceutical Personal Injury Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by STEPHEN HERRE ECHSNER on behalf of TEDROS TEKLE (ECHSNER, STEPHEN) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by JUSTIN GRAEM WITKIN on behalf of TEDROS TEKLE (WITKIN, JUSTIN) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD. (djb) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by DOUGLASS ALAN KREIS on behalf of TEDROS TEKLE (KREIS, DOUGLASS) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4261884.), filed by TEDROS TEKLE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 SUMMONS FOR Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, #3 SUMMONS FOR Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc, #4 SUMMONS FOR Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co Ltd) (KREIS, DOUGLASS) |
| JUDGE M CASEY RODGERS and MAGISTRATE JUDGE GARY R JONES added. (djb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
