PUGH v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
| MARKETA PUGH |
| SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION |
| 3:2019cv00042 |
| January 14, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| M CASEY RODGERS |
| ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER DENYING without prejudice, #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of forms for non-prisoner parties to request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Within 30 days from the date of docketing of this order, Plaintiff shall pay the full $400 filing fee, or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with a properly completed financial status. (Order and form mailed.) ( Fee due by 3/30/2019.). Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 2/28/2019. (alb)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MARKETA PUGH. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #4 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Fee not received). (MB) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER denying without prejudice #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The clerk is directed to send Plaintiff a copy of the form for non- prisoner parties to request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Within 30 days from the date of docketing of this order, Plaintiff must pay the full $400.00 filing fee, or submit a motion to proceed in forma pauperis with a properly completed affidavit of financial status as indicated above.(Order and forms mailed.)( Fee due by 2/15/2019.) Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 1/16/2019. (alb)
|
| Filing 3 Notice to Pro Se Litigant. (alb) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by MARKETA PUGH. (alb) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, filed by MARKETA PUGH. (No service copies) (alb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, #1 Complaint. Referred to ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY. (alb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: PUGH v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: MARKETA PUGH | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
