KENNEDY v. INCH
| ERVIN KENNEDY, III |
| MARK INCH |
| 3:2019cv00514 |
| March 22, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
| LACEY A COLLIER |
| CHARLES A STAMPELOS |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER. Respondent's motion (ECF No. #6 ) is GRANTED. The time for filing an answer is extended to 9/3/2019. Petitioner shall have until 10/3/2019, to file a reply, if any. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 7/3/19. (blb)
|
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed Re: #6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Referred to CHARLES A STAMPELOS. (blb) |
| Filing 6 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, #5 Order,,, Set Deadlines/Hearings,, by MARK INCH. (DUFFY, THOMAS) |
| Set/Reset Deadlines: MARK INCH answer due 7/1/2019. (blb) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER DIRECTING RESPONSE TO 2254 PETITION. The Clerk shall serve copies of the habeas corpus petition (ECF No. #1 ) and this order on Respondent and the Attorney General of the State of Florida. Respondent shall file an answer, motion, or other response to the petition on or before 7/1/2019. Petitioner shall file a reply, if any, no later than 7/31/2019. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 4/1/19. (blb) *Forms Sent as Directed*
|
| Filing 4 Filing fee: $ 5.00, receipt number FLN300012775. Fee status updated to paid. (blb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed Re: 4 Filing Fee Received. (blb) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER. The Clerk of Court shall forward to Petitioner an application for leave to proceed IFP. Petitioner shall have until 4/26/2019, to either submit a complete IFP application or pay the $5.00 filing fee. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS on 3/27/19. (blb) *Forms provided as directed*
|
| Filing 2 Notice to Pro Se (blb) |
| ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS notified that action is needed Re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. (blb) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by ERVIN KENNEDY, III. *Two service copies provided, No Fee, No IFP* (blb) |
| SENIOR JUDGE LACEY A COLLIER and MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES A STAMPELOS added. (djb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: KENNEDY v. INCH | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ERVIN KENNEDY, III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MARK INCH | |
| Represented By: | THOMAS HOWLAND DUFFY |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
