BROWN v. CACTUS CANTINA OF PENSACOLA, LLC et al
DELARIUS BROWN |
CACTUS CANTINA OF PENSACOLA, LLC and MANDY SALAS |
3:2019cv02903 |
August 1, 2019 |
US District Court for the Northern District of Florida |
ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY |
ROGER VINSON |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 451 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 30, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by DELARIUS BROWN. MANDY SALAS waiver sent on 8/15/2019, answer due 10/14/2019. (WESTBERRY, RICHARD) |
Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by DELARIUS BROWN. CACTUS CANTINA OF PENSACOLA, LLC waiver sent on 8/6/2019, answer due 10/7/2019. (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Filing 5 *DUPLICATE of D.E. #3 BRENDA L WADE, as Registered Agent for CACTUS CANTINA OF PENSACOLA, LLC. NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR SUMMONS by DELARIUS BROWN (CONNORS, CLAYTON) Modified on 8/5/2019 (MB). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to MANDY SALAS, (Attachments: #1 BRENDA WADE, as Registered Agent for CACTUS CANTINA OF PENSACOLA, LLC). (MB) |
Filing 3 NOTICE OF REQUEST FOR SUMMONS by DELARIUS BROWN (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Filing 2 NOTICE Request for Summons by DELARIUS BROWN (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number AFLNDC-4574960.), filed by DELARIUS BROWN. (With attached CIVIL COVER SHEET) (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (CONNORS, CLAYTON) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Florida Northern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.